<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All go ooh and aah at WordPress 2.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/</link>
	<description>Tim's blog on anything from this week's lectionary, to open source software like WordPress</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4258</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4258</guid>
		<description>There is a patch for WP 2.5 to allow IE7 to upload multiple files.  http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/7573  This is not in the current download, but will probably be in WP 2.5.1
The Upsilon theme does not seem to like the WP 2.5 automatic image galleries.  The photos in the gallery seem to carry over the css width formatting from the Smooth Gallery images, instead of the 150x150px or 300x300px specified in the the gallery short code.  http://openaranch.com/?p=61
I think the new widget panel will be better suited to and will be more appreciated when themes have widgetized headers, footers, sidebars, main content, etc.  Or have specific widgets for specific categories, posts or pages, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a patch for WP 2.5 to allow IE7 to upload multiple files.  <a href="http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/7573" rel="nofollow">http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/7573</a>  This is not in the current download, but will probably be in WP 2.5.1<br />
The Upsilon theme does not seem to like the WP 2.5 automatic image galleries.  The photos in the gallery seem to carry over the css width formatting from the Smooth Gallery images, instead of the 150&#215;150px or 300&#215;300px specified in the the gallery short code.  <a href="http://openaranch.com/?p=61" rel="nofollow">http://openaranch.com/?p=61</a><br />
I think the new widget panel will be better suited to and will be more appreciated when themes have widgetized headers, footers, sidebars, main content, etc.  Or have specific widgets for specific categories, posts or pages, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>I agree, Paul. They've dropped the drag and drop interface which was much neater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Paul. They&#8217;ve dropped the drag and drop interface which was much neater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4238</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4238</guid>
		<description>I've upgraded 4 of my sites so far, and the one thing that has really frustrated me so far is how complicated they have made moving widgets from one side bar to another. Not complicated as in hard to figure out, but complicated in way too many steps to accomplish. This seems like a major step backwards.

Still deciding on other changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve upgraded 4 of my sites so far, and the one thing that has really frustrated me so far is how complicated they have made moving widgets from one side bar to another. Not complicated as in hard to figure out, but complicated in way too many steps to accomplish. This seems like a major step backwards.</p>
<p>Still deciding on other changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>The gallery function  seems to struggle on my firefox version 2 on the MAC, but fine with safari, weird....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gallery function  seems to struggle on my firefox version 2 on the MAC, but fine with safari, weird&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4213</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4213</guid>
		<description>Thought you might like to know WordPress 2.5 stable works with your Upsilon theme and cformsII v 8.02.  WP-Sticky vers 1.1 or 1.3Beta breaks the site.  The new WP 2.5 multi-file upload &#38; automatic gallery feature works seems only to work with Firefox 2.0 with Flash enabled, but not IE7 with or without Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought you might like to know WordPress 2.5 stable works with your Upsilon theme and cformsII v 8.02.  WP-Sticky vers 1.1 or 1.3Beta breaks the site.  The new WP 2.5 multi-file upload &amp; automatic gallery feature works seems only to work with Firefox 2.0 with Flash enabled, but not IE7 with or without Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>It probably takes some getting used to. Time will tell whether it improves the blogger's work flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably takes some getting used to. Time will tell whether it improves the blogger&#8217;s work flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://livingos.com/2008/03/31/all-go-ooh-and-aah-at-wordpress-25/#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingos.com/?p=412#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>My first impressions were not great - but I think I'll prefer it the more I use it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impressions were not great - but I think I&#8217;ll prefer it the more I use it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
